On The Colorado

Discussion:   Talk about this article...

Blue Castle Holdings: Nuclear power proposal along the Green River in Utah

May 18, 2010
by John Weisheit

The Green River
The Green River

Update: The water right transfer for this propose Nuclear Powerplant from San Juan County Water Conservancy District has been annulled. Letter of 2/12/2021 from Uranium Watch to Utah Division of Water Rights. This indicates that there is no investor confidence in this project.


Water Rights Hearing in Utah's 7th District Court

  • NEWS: Utah's First Proposed Nuclear Plant Goes On Trial - Click here
  • Read Judge Harmond's Decision - Click here
  • Transcript of the five-day trial - Click here

Utah Disvision of Water Rights Approves Water Right for Nuclear Power Plant

  • Click here to read the story by Judy Fahys of the Salt Lake Tribune announcing Utah's positive decision by the state engineer to approve the water transfer for the proposed nucler power plant near Green River, Utah.
  • Click here to read the press release by Utah State Engineer.
  • Click here to read the decision of Kane County water transfer.
  • Click here to read decision of San Juan County water transfer.
  • Click here to read the request for reconsideration by Uranium Watch et al.
  • Click here to read the request for reconsideration by HEAL et al.
  • Click here to read the Engineer's denial to reconsider.
  • Read transcript of the January 12, 2010 protest hearing conducted by the State Engineer here.

Kane County Water Right Transfer (The year of priority is 1965 and, according to Judge Harmon's Court Order, is now subordinate to the Central Utah Project)

San Juan County Water Right Transfer (The year of priority became 2000 after the water right was reinstated; the water right was granted extensions in 2006 and 2011; the next extension is due in 2017)

Water diversions in Eastern Utah are dependent on federal contracts from a water right called Ultimate Phase. 

NOTE: Since the water rights are bifurcated, and nearly half of the combined water supply has a junior water right, the operations of the proposed nuclear powerplant are likely to be curtailed during a water shortage in the Colorado River basin. The Bureau of Reclamation is anticipating a 50/50 chance of shortages occurring in the lower basin in 2016, and the Department of Energy is also expecting power generation at Glen Canyon Dam to be curtailed in 2016.

Securities Corruption by Financial Partner of Blue Castle Holdings
  • Click here to read this story by Judy Fahys and Steven Oberbeck in the Salt Lake Tribune about a fraud case involving a financial partner of BLue Castle Holdings, LeadDog Capital.
  • Click here  for the archived press release of Blue Castle Holdings' partnership agreement with LeadDog Capital that has since been removed from the web page of Blue Castle Holdings.
  • Click here to read this story by Judy Fahys and Steven Oberbeck in the Salt Lake Tribune, which includes the administrative record of the State Engineer's review.

Emery County Economic Development Director Resigns

Willow Creek Pipeline Company and Acquisition by Blue Castle Holdings

Dominate utility in Utah not interested in developing nuclear power

Op Eds About Nuclear Power

National Academy of Sciences


Other News

  • Scientific American has published a 100% wind, water & solar energy proposal for the entire world by 2030 here.
  • Read article in Salt Lake Weekly of May 2011 here


The proposed nuclear power plant and industrial park on State-owned lands near Green River, Utah was originally an inspiration of Transistion Power Development LLC, which was formed in October of 2007. The company was restructured in September of 2009 under the corporate name Blue Castle Holdings. BCH claims to be registered as a corporation in the state of Delaware. The company was first based in Salt Lake City and is now based in Provo. 

The CEO of BCH is Aaron Tilton, a former member of the Utah legislature turned energy lobbyist. The BCH website is devoid of any pertinent information about the project and instead reads like a white paper to convince investors and the public that nuclear energy is safe and affordable. The nuclear industry has three strikes that tells us otherwise: Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima.

Investors have always stated that without public subsidies and limited liability insurance, nuclear energy is a risky business adventure. For example, Bloomberg Business informs readers here that the decommissioning of the damaged nuclear reactor in Japan will take 30 years and cost Tokyo Electric 12 billion dollars.

A possible alternative proposal to this turn key boondoogle is to place solar panels on every south-facing roof in sun-drenched Utah. Such a proposal would have broader public acceptance, is less expensive, faster to implement, uses less water overall, preserves open space, avoids massive vapor plumes in the viewsheds of national parks, and avoids the controversy of radioactive waste, leaks, accidents and issues of homeland security.
The electricity from the nuclear facility is targeted for the Wasatch Front (Salt Lake City) with surplus for Wyoming, California, Nevada and Arizona. It is also possible that the energy could be targeted to develop oil shale and tar sands in the Uinta Basin of the Colorado Plateau, which would resemble mountain top removal in Appalachia, or the destruction of the boreal forests and watersheds of Alberta, Canada.

The total low ball cost is projected to be 16 billion dollars (decommissioning costs not included) with a projected completion date of Unit One in 2020, which is too optimistic when considering the actual construction calendar of Unit One at Arizona's Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station. Nor does the schedule and price tag account for protests, rallies, direct action and legal challenges from the general public. The Colorado Plateau does have, after all, the highest concentration of national parks and monuments in North America.

Green River is a cozy, small farming town with sleep over motels, but the price tag does not consider the zero housing available for the necessary staff and construction workers of the power plant, nor the cost of improving basic utilities, services, schools, and the expansion of the city sewer system. Green River City doesn't even have a hospital.

The proposed facility is located on 1,627 acres of School Institutional Trust Lands (SITLA) near the Intersection of Hwy 6 and Interstate 70 (photo), a few miles west of Green River City. SITLA is a state land agency that behaves like an obsessive real estate broker who would approve an oil derrick next to your grandmother's garden without the decency of telling her. 
The water intake would be near the I-70 bridge crossing the Green River with a high-security pipeline corridor to the power plant (layout). The total annual amount of water to be consumed by the power plant is 54,000 acre-feet; there are no return flows to the Green River. There is no contract with the federal government to supply water from Flaming Gorge Reservoir to the project in times of shortages, so when the demand for water is high in July and August, the withdrawal will pose a significant threat to endangered fish. Sandbar nursery habitats are closed to entry or exit when the river drops in elevation. This event can either reduce available habitat for juvenille fish, or strand fish that will then succumb to poor water quality or predators.
This project is really about securing more rights to water for the state of Utah, than it is about securing energy for the nation. Water in search of a project is another way of putting it. The decision before Utah Division of Water Rights is about approving the transfer of two water rights to Emery County, one from San Juan County and the other from Kane County (lease agreement). The original points of diversion (POD) are the San Juan River and Lake Powell. The two counties would lease their water rights to Blue Castle Holdings and then use those funds to develop small surface water projects in their perspective counties. In otherwords, this proposed transfer will increase the overall consumption of surface water in three Utah counties.
For more information about the protests to the water rights for this project, click here.
The problems are two-fold: surplus water does not exist in the Colorado River basin and the endangered species problem does.

The state of Utah is the last hope for the recovery of endangered fish species because the Green River flows free for 425 miles between Flaming Gorge Reservoir and Lake Powell. In the summertime the river flows are dangerously low due to over-consumption and evaporation. It is quite common to see comatose fish floating upside down along the Green River, victims of summertime hypoxia (lack of oxygen).

The other problem is the water supply of the Colorado River has peaked basin-wide. In fact, every metropolis in the arid west is at peak water. Their conservation programs are not about easing water stress for their communities, since the water savings is quickly converted into yet more urban sprawl.

Four species of native fish are endangered, and populations are augmented artificially from fish hatchery stock. Additionally, three threatened fish species in the Green River are approaching endangerment. If the looming fish problem is not solved soon, which is unlikely considering 28 years of unsuccessful programming, the fish will eventually get the higher priority for water. If the Endangered Species Act is gutted by Congress, the water quanity/quality problem would still exist in the form of Lakes Powell and Mead going empty. For example, Lake Mead only has to drop another 20 feet before cutbacks to Nevada and Arizona begin. If the problem escalates further, the hydrosociety will be dependent on a system called "run of the river" which is what existed before Hoover Dam was built. A return to dust, as it were.

The water agencies are not thrilled about the proposal of Blue Castle Holdings. The Bureau of Reclamation is concerned that water for the Central Utah Project is at risk. The US Fish and Wildlife Service is concerned about the recovery of endangered fish, as is Utah Division of Water Resources. See also Dr. Holden's comments on this proposed project.
There is compelling information for the State Engineer of the Utah Division of Water Rights to deny this water transfer application, but Blue Castle Holdings has the ear of the state legislature, which finds the time to pass dubious resolutions like denying climate change (cached), scolding professors at Brigham Young University, and challenging the public ownership of federal lands in the court system with the legal fees paid for by the SITLA sleaze fund.
Additional Information
 Read letter by Heal Utah about speculation by BCH here.

Read letter by Utah Division of Water Rights that denies application by Mancos Resources for a uranium mill at proposed Green River Industrial Park here.

USGS daily stream data for Green River gage: Plots; Raw data;





Discussion:   Talk about this article...


Dam Operations
Public Notices


Back of Beyond Books
Barbara Anne Morra Memorial
Canyon Country Rising Tide
Canyonlands Watershed Council
Celebrating the Grand Canyon
Center for Biological Diversity
Colorado River Connected
Colorado Riverkeeper
Corey Allen Hale Memorial
Dive Into Democracy
Five Quail Books
Frank West Bering, Jr. Memorial
Friends of the Earth
Going Solar
Great Basin Water Network
Green River Action Network
Holiday River Expeditions
Las Vegas Water Defender
Living Rivers
New Belgium Brewing Company
O.A.R.S White Water Rafting
Paul Henderson Memorial
Peaceful Uprising
People's Energy Movement
Resource Renewal Institute
Returning Rapids Project
Rig To Flip
River Runners for Wilderness
Save The Colorado
Serena Supplee Gallery
Sheep Mountain Alliance
Steaming Bean Coffee Company
Tom Till Photography
Upper Colorado River Watershed Group
Upper Green River Network
Uranium Watch
Utah Rivers Council
Utah Tar Sands Resistance
Wabi Sabi
Waterkeeper Alliance

On The Colorado All content © 2024 On The Colorado Contact UsFollow us on Twitter